Community Feasibility Study: Project Brief
Updated: Feb 10
In a typical fundraising campaign feasibility study, an organization embarks on a series of steps to craft and test a case for financial support. Lots of consultants offer tried-and-true methods and amazing formulas for analyzing the current financial ability of your donors plus the potential for new gifts for the case. We think traditional fundraising feasibility studies work—we’ve benefited from them ourselves and offer them for our clients—they can raise a great deal of money.
But… (you knew it was coming) if we are really alignment with our firm values, raising money alone doesn't seem like enough. We started thinking about how an organization in campaign mode might test for more than just the money. What about testing what the community—clients served by the case—feels and knows about the work proposed?
So, we called on our experience with organizing, advocacy and policy change and on our network of experts to dig deeper into this question. In a typical community organizing power analysis, an organization embarks on a series of steps to understand the types and quantity of power available to change a policy or practice—including the will of the community on a particular issue. Nonprofits deploy power analysis and the resulting information to craft strategies that advance their missions. We know from experience that this, too, works.
In fact, SVA recently completed what we call a community feasibility study for an organization interested in shifting city policy to allow for better quality of life for people living with intellectual and developmental disabilities. In interviews with directly impacted stakeholder groups, we blended an organizing power analysis with fundraising feasibility-style case testing. Instead of measuring the dollars this organization could raise from the community, we tested for the number of people the leaders could turn out in support of the project, and for those leaders who have a special ability to make an impact on key decision-makers. It was a powerful, straightforward way to listen to impacted community members first, and then test for what it would take to bring the broader community on board to shift policy. It set the direction our client would need to consider taking and quantified the work ahead. There were surprises and new thinking to pursue along the way, and what we found was different than what we initially imagined.
Completing this project got us thinking again about community-centered feasibility studies for fundraising. What would it look like if an organization embarking on a fundraising campaign paired the community feasibility study with a fundraising feasibility study? What if the organization started with the questions “does the community served support the programs this campaign funds?” and “what would it take to bring the broader community into political/cultural alignment with the case”?
As usual we’d expect to have some surprises along the way, some proposed shifts to the case coming from community, and remarkably interesting information to share back with donors and supporters as the study progresses. However, many of us in fundraising worry about the risk of changing what’s tried and true. We already have so many unknowns in our jobs as money-movers. Why add more risk?
But what do we risk when we don’t start with community?
Luckily, our organizing and policy buddies have been doing this kind of community study within the power analysis framework for a long time. Knowing that fact can help community-centric fundraisers mitigate the perceived risks of trying something seemingly untested.
Organizations have the option to add community feasibility alongside fundraising feasibility to create stronger, more compelling study results for the full community we serve—not just the donors.
If you’re interested adding community organizing elements to your fundraising or if you're curious about how our community feasibility study connects to your campaign planning, we’d love to talk with you.